🔗 Share this article

Europe breathed a deep collective sigh of relief on Monday, as the crisis triggered by the presentation of a new 28-point plan for achieving ceasefire appeared – temporarily – to have been defused. A Washington representative spoke of "notable headway" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its response: a renewed assault of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Negotiation and Warfare

The chain of conflicting incidents captured the grim essence of the recent timeframe. By day, political struggles are conducted: hopeful statements are delivered from different nations. Immense energy is allocated on containing specific proposals. By night, Moscow brutally reminds the world that, for them, military action persists as the key method for achieving "peace".

Nighttime Reality

As Russia's attack progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's exposure was laid bare. Ukraine is capable of detecting projectile deployments from Russian territory, a capability afforded by up-to-date information. From observation points, military aircraft that had been deployed to counter approaching cruise missiles flew past – advanced fighter aircraft provided to Ukraine by NATO members.

Moments later, Kyiv's air-defence systems thundered: multiple launches targeted at a hostile projectile. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, presumably delivered by allied countries. Every launch shakes the surroundings, shaking the windows. The brief panic quickly becomes sober acceptance: maybe the hostile projectile won't strike its target this time, preventing destruction from ruin and another blackout.

Ongoing Risks

Soon after, a automatic firearm fired at a unmanned aircraft somewhere nearby, part of a mobile-fire group – most likely allied-provided weaponry. Regrettably, the projectiles didn't strike the opposing UAV – it pressed on overhead toward its destination.

Intermittently, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv faced the daybreak reports: several casualties, devastation and infrastructure problems in numerous residences as a result of the night's assault. As customarily, everyone still went about their day – experiencing conflict. But those entire period encapsulated Ukraine's critical military reliance on external assistance – a reliance that neighboring countries are clearly incapable to substitute in the immediate future.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The detailed framework from US administration generated strong feelings, discussion and profound anxiety – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after earlier high-level meetings and bilateral conferences.

Every new initiative from American administration adheres to the consistent cycle: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, manages to fend off. They stabilise the situation but never actually achieve victory. This trend will, undoubtedly, persist.

Political Considerations

It is easy to blame specific actors of consistently pushing Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. Washington works based on a premise well known to international relations experts: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have lost on the battlefield. The American government presumes that it is unfeasible to force Russia to surrender the areas that it already controls in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The issue is that while accepting these circumstances, American administration does nothing to deter Moscow, through statements or actions, from believing that the situation will not change more in its advantage in the near future.

Divergent Views

Therefore, the Kremlin is confident that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its partners are approaching exhaustion. Their motivation to sign a deal that does not give them the largest achievable advantage is virtually nonexistent. There may be numerous efforts to end hostilities, but they will carry on as long as Russia's leader remains completely certain in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still persist, progressively conceding people and territory but preventing a complete military breakdown until situations evolve in its favour.

Current Realities

Objectively, there are no actual prerequisites for a ceasefire. Now, personal considerations are entering the equation: political desires to negotiate peace and achieve global acclaim, and Ukrainian leadership's double obstacles – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the country's interests against any proposal Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their priority does not shift toward domestic problems. And although their mission will now be considerably more difficult after latest incidents, it remains very improbable that this will modify their basic position.

These conflicting dynamics are influencing discussions.

Assessment and Future

It took a only one week to terminate the 28 points of the most recent proposal. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by US administration, resistance by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with calming attempts of representatives, and finally, current information leaks, all served their function.

While new initiatives based on previous concepts are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist negotiation assaults from Washington that are based on Russian demands and demonstrate specific hesitation to change the course of events, if they stand together and improve their protective measures at a much faster pace. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to repel nightly air assaults will, for the foreseeable future, mainly require sustained allied backing.