🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has claimed to have harvested a vast number of songs from Spotify and is preparing to release them publicly.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Observers said the apparent leak could aid AI companies looking for data to train their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a Spotify spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an investigation into unauthorized access identified a third party collected public metadata and employed illicit methods to bypass DRM protections.

Group's Stated Mission and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a method of sharing large data files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Battleground

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ copyright, remarked the breached music would probably be used for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced data is unfortunately common in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to LibGen, a huge online repository of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by Meta to develop its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “create their own personal free version of the service”. He said it could also enable technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between artists, writers and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner opts out. Virtually every respondent to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, research and technology told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.